Underneath the Surface: When the Labor Market, Liquidity, and Bonds tell a Different Story than Headlines
The Pioneer Perspective - Week Ending February 13, 2026
What We’ll Cover:
· Jobs Data
· Growth Stocks and Liquidity Tightening
· The Bond Market’s Potential Confirmation
· Summary
Let’s pretend that the media headlines are the Ministry of Magic, doing everything they possibly can to keep order, despite a clear threat underneath the surface. Somewhere in a dark hallway of Fox News one can quietly here the word “Imperio” uttered, followed by analysts and talking heads mindlessly participating in the narrative that everything is hunky-dory.
Let’s talk jobs. Here’s some important data that was released this week for the labor market.
1. January Jobs: +130,000, shattering expectations of +55,000.
2. Unemployment Rate: 4.3%, a drop from last month’s number of 4.4%.
To the casual observer these numbers look pretty dang good. Let’s pop the hood and see what’s underneath.
Revisions, you’d think that after years of seeing downward revisions we would almost become accustomed to it, you’d be wrong. When the final annualized jobs numbers came in we saw that the US only added 181,000 jobs for all of 2025. Compare this to the original number of 584,000 and we now have a 69% decrease, quite the oopsie daisy. We were told 2025 was a "Soft Landing" year. These revisions prove it was actually a stagnant year where hiring virtually disappeared. The January beat of 130k only looks good because they just admitted the baseline was almost zero.
Sectors, some jobs are steady and reliable, many are not. The largest gain of jobs wass almost exclusively in healthcare and social services, with a combined +123,000. However, blue-collar jobs like manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing lost a combine 166,000 since February 2025. Aside from all the layoffs in big tech recently, this recent report showed that other white-collar jobs like finance and information lost 22,000 and 12,000, respectively.
Lastly, we have household data and federal resignations. Household data is a metric that judges people who are working part-time to bring in some extra cash. It measures those who want to have a full-time job, but can only find part-time work. That number has risen by 410,000 in the last 12 months. Federal resignations are also dragging down the economy a bit. The federal workforce lost 34,000 jobs in January alone, and they’ve lost a total of about 320,000 jobs since the start of 2025. The total number of jobs lost represents almost 11% of the entire federal workforce. Some may welcome this change, claiming that many jobs in the government don’t need to be there. Nonetheless, it does put more downward pressure on the labor market, at least in the short-term.
Liquidity Tightening and the Federal Reserve
Big tech and crypto continue to see declines. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is down 3.2% in the last two weeks. On February 1 we said this:
Real rates are the nominal rate minus inflation expectations. For example, if the Federal Reserve has rates set at 5.25%, and inflation expectations drop from 4% to 2.5%, you’ve now increased the real rate from 1.25% to 2.75%. This is the market’s way of confirming that inflation IS posed for continued cooling. Lower inflation doesn’t automatically mean easier money. When rates stay high and the dollar is strong, borrowing becomes more expensive in real terms, and liquidity quietly tightens.
We were given more CPI data last week, showing YoY inflation coming in cool at 2.4%, beating expectations of 2.5%. Good news, right? Yes, but not entirely. Big tech closed the day mostly flat despite cooling inflation, meanwhile bonds surged and had their best week since March 2025. Why? Real rates. With the Fed signaling a pause while inflation drops, real rates increase.
We also have the nomination of Kevin Warsh to takeover the mantle of Fed Chair, replacing Jerome Powell. Though he has not been confirmed yet, many in the markets view him as a money hawk. He wants to lower nominal rates while maintaining high real rates. Seems contradictory, we know, let us explain. Warsh is a big proponent of slashing the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet (QT), which would make the private markets the price setter without the Fed. Here is a direct quote from Warsh during a lecture he gave in 2025:
"If the printing press could be quiet [referring to the balance sheet], we could have lower policy rates. We should abandon the dogma that growth causes inflation. Productivity improvements should drive significant increases in real take-home wages, allowing the economy to thrive at a natural rate of interest that isn't subsidized by central bank intervention."
Essentially, with lower nominal rates but a slashed balance sheet, the private markets will have to step in to fill the demand. Private markets will require a higher premium to mitigate risk due to the Federal Reserve no longer being a money printer.
Stress in the banking system is another signal that things are cracking in the economy. The Federal Reserve has a tool called the Standing Repo Facility, which helps keep lending stable when liquidity is tight. If a bank needs more cash, and has plenty of bonds, they go to the Fed and offer treasuries as collateral for cash. They get the cash overnight, and things move along fine. Typically, the SRF sits at $0.00, however under times of banking stress the backstop rises. Well, the SRF has now surged to $29.4 billion, the highest since the early 2000s. Ultimately, this means that banks are willing to pay a higher premium to get cash because private markets are dry.
To recap, we have a massive amount of liquidity tightening taking place. Banks are clearly struggling to find cash, which means they are less likely to loan money, allow margin trading, accept down payments for mortgages, etc.
The Story Bonds are Telling
With Kevin Warsh being seen as a hawk who wants to keep real rates high, we should expect a negative response from the bond markets. Yet, last week TLT 0.06%↑ posted its best weekly close since March 2025. The price action in bonds tells us that the markets are concerned with something other than interest rates.
1. Recession Fears: When the labor market starts to crack, investors stop caring about who the Fed Chair is and fly to safety. With consistent downward revisions to our jobs numbers, which are already coming in underwhelming, investors are more concerned about unemployment than they are inflation. There is a sense that Warsh may exacerbate this fear by vowing to cut the balance sheet. Investors are worried that if he cuts the balance sheet too drastically, in conjunction with labor warning signs, he may completely break the economy. Bonds are a way to front-run fast rate cuts and a weakening economy.
2. The Devil You Know: For months, markets were afraid that President Trump’s pick to replace Powell would be some political pawn that will exact his will, regardless of data. With Warsh being the nominee, and having a reputation of actually being a hawk, markets now have a different view. Increasing inflation has been priced into the markets for years, now we see that the inflation risk-premium has actually dropped. This is more confirmation that inflation is not as big of an issue as the labor market.
There are also technical signals that lead us believe TLT 0.06%↑ will be moving higher from here. Last week we did a comprehensive analysis on why we are bullish $TLT. Here is a part of our newsletter:
The Coiling: Please note the continued tightening of the stock price. Volatility has slowed and the price has fluctuated between $84 and $94 since early 2025, yet has been tightening in a baroader sense for the last two years. In the bond market, this is known as “coiling”. In the past, such a tight range in TLT 0.08%↑ has resulted in a 10%-15% move in one direction or the other. We believe that, given the current macro-economic environment, the impending move will be up.
TLT 0.06%↑ has officially broken out of that white upper trend line with conviction. We will be watching closely for a false breakout, however the $89.50 was a strong resistance level and it never even went back down to test it once the level was upended.
TLT’s massive week isn't a mistake—it's a warning. While the media focuses on the Warsh-hawk narrative, the bond market is looking at the SRF spikes and weakening labor data and concluding that a hard landing is becoming the base case. The surge in $TLT suggests that 'Duration' has officially reassumed its role as the primary hedge against economic contraction. The message from the bond vigilantes is clear: They fear a recession more than they fear Kevin Warsh or inflation.
In Short
The current economic landscape is defined by the labor market's fragile stabilization, marked by tepid hiring and massive downward revisions to 2025 job gains, colliding with a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve leadership. While the nomination of Kevin Warsh has signaled an era focused on aggressive balance sheet reduction (QT) and AI-driven productivity, the financial plumbing is already showing signs of a liquidity trap, evidenced by spikes in the Standing Repo Facility and a sharp de-risking in crypto and high-beta tech. The bond market has issued a warning of a looming policy error, effectively betting that a credit crunch or recession will force the Fed to abandon its tightening plans long before they are complete.
Thanks for reading! Until next time, good luck out there and Godspeed.
We send out newsletters like this weekly to our subscribers, and we also have a live portfolio that we update weekly and send out. For our newsletter you can subscribe to our Silver Membership, for our portfolio and weekly allocation updates subscribe to our Gold Membership. Link below!
Pioneer Financial, LLC - Products
Disclosures & Disclaimers: This newsletter is published by Pioneer Financial, LLC for informational and educational purposes only. The contents of this publication should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice, nor as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any specific security.